Das Smart-City-Panoptikum

 Das Konzept des intelligenten Wachstums war eine brillante Marketingstrategie, die in den frühen 1990er-Jahren als Ersatz für die Agenda 21 eingeführt wurde. Normalerweise mag es der Mensch nicht, in Agenden einbezogen zu werden, die er nicht geschaffen oder gebilligt hat, aber er hat sich sofort für die Idee erwärmt, intelligent zu sein. Wer will schon dumm sein? Das Konzept des intelligenten Wachstums hat eine Fülle von Ableitungen hervorgebracht, wie zum Beispiel Smart City, Smart Phone, Smart Network, Smart Home, Smart Streets, Smart Cars, Smart Grid, Smart Appliances und so weiter. Im Grunde genommen steht der Begriff smart aber für alles, was mit Technologie ausgestattet ist, um das Objekt, auf das er sich bezieht, zu kontrollieren.

Was ist das Panoptikum?

Das Panoptikum ist ein institutionelles Gebäude, in dem Menschen unter Aufsicht gehalten werden, sei es ein Krankenhaus, eine Schule, eine öffentliche Unterkunft für zum Beispiel Flüchtlinge, eine Fabrik oder eine psychiatrische Anstalt. Die berühmteste Anwendung ist die eines Gefängnisses.

Das Wesen des Panoptikums ist die zentrale Überwachung. Nach Jeremy Bentham wäre es ideal, wenn die Menschen, die in einer Anstalt gehalten werden, das Gefühl hätten, ständig beobachtet zu werden, auch wenn das nicht der Fall ist — denn, das „Sehen, ohne gesehen zu werden“ lässt die Gefangenen glauben, der Wärter würde sie ständig beobachten und zwingt sie damit in den faschistoiden Zustand des vorauseilenden Gehorsams.

Entwicklung von Smart Citys

Weltweit gibt es einige Gemeinsamkeiten von Smart Citys, die in der Praxis und in der Literatur leicht zu beobachten sind:

1. Überwachung der Menschen mithilfe von biometrischen Gesichtsscans, geo-räumlicher Verfolgung, Finanzdaten, sozialen Medien et cetera. Eine Bevölkerung, die überwacht wird, kann leicht kontrolliert werden.
2. Mobilität: Die Menschen werden davon „überzeugt“, auf ihre Privatfahrzeuge zu verzichten und öffentliche Verkehrsmittel wie Motorroller, Fahrräder, Busse, Stadtbahnen et cetera zu nutzen. Ohne private Verkehrsmittel sind sie an die Stadt und nicht an das ländliche Gebiet gebunden. Die Energiepreise werden auch aus diesem Grunde gerade künstlich in die Höhe getrieben.
3. Daten werden in Echtzeit aus dem Internet of Everything (IoE) koordiniert. IoE ist eine Ausweitung des Konzepts des Internets der Dinge (IoD) auf den Menschen.
4. Kontrolle: Social Engineering steht bei der Entwicklung von Smart Citys immer an der Spitze der Überlegungen. Damit entscheiden selbst ernannte Technokraten, was die Bürger tun oder nicht tun sollen, wohin sie gehen oder nicht gehen sollen, mit wem sie verkehren oder nicht verkehren sollen … Die flächendeckende Einführung von Social Credits ist nicht von der politischen Kaste orchestriert, sie haben nur umzusetzen.

All dies entspricht der ursprünglichen Definition der Technokratie, die 1938 in der Zeitschrift The Technocrat veröffentlicht wurde:.......

ganzer Artikel und weiterlesen hier: Das Smart-City-Panoptikum | Rubikon-Magazin

Telosa: A Technocratic City In The Making

One of the great myths of the modern age is that of the beneficent billionaire. The tale is simple and told in just two acts. In the first act these men and women rise from humble beginnings to amass inordinate amounts of wealth, power, and influence over society. Their second act begins when they are reborn as philanthropists whose only purpose in life is to save the planet.

This is the story of many of the world’s wealthiest individuals. Variations of it apply to the likes of Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, Richard Branson, and Pierre Omidyar.

Joining their ranks is entrepreneur and former CEO of e-commerce at Walmart, Marc Lore....

...... Details of Lore’s plans to build the city and notions of what life in Telosa will look like are still relatively scarce. What is known is that over the next 40 years Telosa will grow to cover 150,000 acres and be home to 5 million people. This is approximately the size of Chicago with double the population. The first phase of construction, which would accommodate 50,000 residents across 1,500 acres, comes with an estimated cost of $25 billion and will be ready by 2030 (where have we seen that year before?) The whole project would be expected to exceed $400 billion.

.... The city’s website is filled with buzzwords and marketing slogans meant to portray the plan as being for the betterment of mankind. Potential residents are told they can look forward to a city that “sets a global standard for urban living, expands human potential, and becomes a blueprint for future generations.” Words like “sustainable,” “equitable,” and “inclusive” are sprinkled throughout for good measure.

..... We won’t cover every detail but let’s scroll through the site and take a look at some of the highlights.....

Telosa: A Technocratic City In The Making - What About The Roads?

Building an Empire – The United Nations Using the World Economic Forum to Roll Out Its Agenda

The United Nations (“UN”) “unites” the governments of 193 countries of the world.  The World Economic Forum (“WEF”) “unites” 1,000 of the world’s largest corporations.  The two are joined by a strategic partnership to implement the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 2030.  An agenda which aims to control every aspect of our lives. 

None of these organisations or companies have officials which represent the people. We have not elected them into office to govern or make decisions on our behalf.  And, no electorate has been asked if their goals are our goals or if their goals will create the world we, the people, want.

The UN’s Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development (“Agenda”)

The Agenda, and the Green New Deal, are the ugly sisters of Agenda 21.

According to the Agenda, the 17 Sustainable Development Goals “clearly define the world we want – applying to all nations and leaving no one behind”. The UN makes clear that “business has to play a very important role in the process”.

Paragraph 28 of the Agenda states that “we commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services.”

Paragraph 52 states that this journey “will involve Governments as well as Parliaments, the UN system and other international institutions, local authorities, indigenous peoples, civil society, business and the private sector, the scientific and academic community – and all people.”

Within the UN’s Sustainable Policy, which Britain has adopted, we find the objective to remove private ownership whilst at the same time we also find the objective to re-wild the countryside – the UN envisions that most of the people in the world will be living in cities by 2050.

The Agenda is “a codename for a master plan at the United Nations to change the political and economic system of the world to one of collectivism.  And in order to do that people must not be allowed to have independence.  They must be dependant on the state otherwise they won’t be easily controlled by the state. That means they can’t have private property. They can’t have land of their own. They have to live in, preferably, high rise apartments that are provided to them by the state as a benefit, so to speak,” says G. Edward Griffin, “in order to control mankind you have to get them all into the big cities. You have to get them dependent on the state for food, shelter, electrical power, their water. everything.”  That’s the dirty secret behind the Agenda. (see documentary ‘Unsustainable – The UN’s Agenda for World Domination’ below).

....... “By 2030, six out of every ten people in the world are expected to reside in cities,” said Maimunah Mohd Sharif, Executive Director of UN-Habitat. “We need an urgent change in mindsets, policies, and approaches towards urbanisation to ensure nobody is left behind. We look forward to working with the World Economic Forum to advance the New Urban Agenda and Sustainable Development Goal 11 to make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.”.....

...... The WEF has one Strategic Foundation Partner, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, one Strategic Technology Partner, Salesforce, and 100 Strategic Partners comprising leading companies from around the world, each selected for their commitment to improving the state of the world.

The Strategic Partners “believe in the power of collaboration” to drive change, and to “help shape industry, regional and global agendas.”  Strategic Partners include: Amazon, AstraZeneca, Blackrock, Facebook, Google, Johnson & Johnson, Morgan Stanley, Open Society Foundations and Pfizer.  All but a few of the major players, media excepted, who we strongly associate with the Covid “pandemic.”....

..... WEF, more accurately Klaus Schwab’s, Forum of Young Global Leaders

The Forum of Young Global Leaders was launched by Klaus Schwab in 2004.  It is managed by a board of twelve members, one of which is Jimmy Wales (co-founder of Wikipedia), under the supervision of the Swiss government.  Its forum website states “we are … aligned with the World Economic Forum’s mission, we seek to drive public-private co-operation in the global public interest.” However, in 2008 BusinessWeek described it as “the most exclusive private social network in the world.” 

There are over 1400 members and alumni of 120 nationalities.  There are over 600 alumni across 90 countries who “are CEOs of Fortune 500 corporations, in royal houses, in leading NGO’s and national non-profits, public figures in civil society, sports personalities, and more.”

Notable members and alumni include: Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Sebastian Kurz, Chancellor of Austria; both Larry Page and Sergey Brin, co-founders of Google; Anderson Cooper, primary anchor of CNN News; and, Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook. 

You can search through members for yourself HERE. 

..... The Young Global Leaders members enrol and are “active” for six years. Using terminology such as: class of; graduation; year awarded; and, alumni we could be forgiven for having the impression that it is a finishing school for globalists.

If we, the people of the world, want to stop the totalitarian state of the Agenda taking over our world and everything in it, we need to start by dismantling the UN and its affiliates.  For those nations whose core values include individual freedoms, inalienable rights and democracy we could replace the UN with a United Democracies of the World.

Building an Empire – The United Nations Using the World Economic Forum to Roll Out Its Agenda – The Expose